linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] consider stack access while checking for alternate signal stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091019182630.7c4fa4c1@hskinnemoen-d830>
Date:	Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:26:30 +0900
From:	Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
To:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...akpoint.cc>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] consider stack access while checking for alternate
 signal stack

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...akpoint.cc> wrote:
> >Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc> wrote:  
> >> Haavard: The AVR32 assumption is pure on gcc's STACK_PUSH_CODE which is
> >> POST_DEC. Could you please ack/nak it?  
> >
> >Hmm, no, that is not correct. AVR32 is definitely pre-decrement.
> >
> >Note that 8-bit AVR and AVR32 are two completely different
> >architectures.  
> Ah okay. So the AVR32 bits are not in upstream GCC yet?

No, unfortunately not. We're working on it, and have been for some
time, but the progress is very slow.

Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/