lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091019182630.7c4fa4c1@hskinnemoen-d830> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:26:30 +0900 From: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com> To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...akpoint.cc> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Subject: Re: [PATCH] consider stack access while checking for alternate signal stack Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...akpoint.cc> wrote: > >Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc> wrote: > >> Haavard: The AVR32 assumption is pure on gcc's STACK_PUSH_CODE which is > >> POST_DEC. Could you please ack/nak it? > > > >Hmm, no, that is not correct. AVR32 is definitely pre-decrement. > > > >Note that 8-bit AVR and AVR32 are two completely different > >architectures. > Ah okay. So the AVR32 bits are not in upstream GCC yet? No, unfortunately not. We're working on it, and have been for some time, but the progress is very slow. Haavard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists