lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091019080239.GB25783@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:02:39 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] consider stack access while checking for alternate signal stack * Ingo Molnar | 2009-10-19 09:33:58 [+0200]: >> index 35e3bd9..520c489 100644 >> --- a/arch/avr32/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/avr32/Kconfig >> @@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ config GENERIC_BUG >> def_bool y >> depends on BUG >> >> +config STACK_STORE_POST >> + def_bool y >> + >> source "init/Kconfig" >> >> source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer" Haavard just nacked that part as I mixed up the 8bit AVR with the 32bit version which is POST_DEC as well as the architectures. In that case there are no POST_* architectures available. So the question is should I leave dead code for further reference or just remove it? Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists