linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] consider stack access while checking for alternate signal stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:58:25 +0200
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...akpoint.cc>
To:	Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
Cc:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] consider stack access while checking for alternate
 signal stack

* Haavard Skinnemoen | 2009-10-19 13:09:31 [+0900]:

>Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc> wrote:
>> Haavard: The AVR32 assumption is pure on gcc's STACK_PUSH_CODE which is
>> POST_DEC. Could you please ack/nak it?
>
>Hmm, no, that is not correct. AVR32 is definitely pre-decrement.
>
>Note that 8-bit AVR and AVR32 are two completely different
>architectures.
Ah okay. So the AVR32 bits are not in upstream GCC yet?

>
>Haavard

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/