lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:43:05 +0200
From:	Stephan von Krawczynski <>
To:	linux-kernel <>
Subject: include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h kernel

Hello all,

I lately compiled some app that stumbled across this, and someone smarter than
me should judge if this is right or wrong:

* asm-generic/int-ll64.h
 * Integer declarations for architectures which use "long long"
 * for 64-bit types.


#include <asm/bitsperlong.h>

Is it correct to include from linked "asm" instead of asm-generic ?

My link goes to "asm-x86" but for some reason asm-generic/types.h is included
which ends at int-ll64.h trying to include a not existing bitsperlong.h from
directory asm-x86.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists