[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200910221629.59818.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:29:59 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arndbergmann@...glemail.com>
To: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@...net.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h kernel 2.6.31.4
On Tuesday 20 October 2009, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> I lately compiled some app that stumbled across this, and someone smarter than
> me should judge if this is right or wrong:
>
>
> * asm-generic/int-ll64.h
> *
> * Integer declarations for architectures which use "long long"
> * for 64-bit types.
> */
>
> #ifndef _ASM_GENERIC_INT_LL64_H
> #define _ASM_GENERIC_INT_LL64_H
>
> #include <asm/bitsperlong.h>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>
> Is it correct to include from linked "asm" instead of asm-generic ?
>
> My link goes to "asm-x86" but for some reason asm-generic/types.h is included
> which ends at int-ll64.h trying to include a not existing bitsperlong.h from
> directory asm-x86.
Hi Stephan,
Most likely you are using the kernel headers in an unsupported way, like
trying to point to $(HOME)/linux-2.6/include for include files when building
an application.
Please see http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelHeaders for how to fix that.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists