linux-kernel - Re: pref record question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:00:43 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	Tim Blechmann <tim@...ngt.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pref record question


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 19:04 +0200, Tim Blechmann wrote:
>
> > i am trying to do some profiling with perf (2.6.31.4). while 
> > thread-level profiling works fine, i haven't been able to record 
> > profiling data of a whole process (i.e. main thread + child 
> > threads). from my understanding, this should be enabled by running 
> > 'perf record -i' on the main thread. this does only collect the data 
> > from the main thread, though.
> > 
> > is this an issue with perf or with my understanding of perf?
> 
> -i will only inherit the counters on new fork()/clone() calls, so an 
> existing process/task tree will not automagically get the counters.

Looks like something very much worth fixing.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/