[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091022082500.602f9a7d@marrow.netinsight.se>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:25:00 +0200
From: Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@...insight.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Koskinen Aaro (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] core: Add kernel message dumper to call on
oopses and panics
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:33:11 +0900 (JST)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > I wonder, via which tree this should go in. We are going to have mtdoops
> > > depend on this. Should we go one of these ways:
> > >
> > > * this patch goes to one of Ingo's tip trees, so we can pull it and
> > > work on top.
> > > * we have Ingo's / Linus' acks, and this goes via the MTD tree.
> > > ?
> >
> > Either way is good to me. Linus, do you have any preferences?
>
> Either works for me.
I would put it all through Artems MTD tree then so that we keep the new
API and the user of it close together then.
Thanks to everyone for the reviewing and suggestions!
// Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists