[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1256193368.29856.466.camel@localhost>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:36:08 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@...insight.net>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Koskinen Aaro (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] core: Add kernel message dumper to call on
oopses and panics
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 08:25 +0200, Simon Kagstrom wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:33:11 +0900 (JST)
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > > > I wonder, via which tree this should go in. We are going to have mtdoops
> > > > depend on this. Should we go one of these ways:
> > > >
> > > > * this patch goes to one of Ingo's tip trees, so we can pull it and
> > > > work on top.
> > > > * we have Ingo's / Linus' acks, and this goes via the MTD tree.
> > > > ?
> > >
> > > Either way is good to me. Linus, do you have any preferences?
> >
> > Either works for me.
>
> I would put it all through Artems MTD tree then so that we keep the new
> API and the user of it close together then.
>
> Thanks to everyone for the reviewing and suggestions!
>
It's dwmw2's tree actually. I just act as his secretary :-)
David, could you push this patch to your tree? Ingo's and Linus' acks
are there, AFAIU.
Simon, I'll look at your other mtdoops patches as well a bit later.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists