[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091026025406.GC8086@crane-desktop>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:54:06 +0800
From: Crane Cai <crane.cai@....com>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
CC: djwong@...ibm.com, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
lenb@...nel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-scmi: support IBM SMBus CMI devices
Hi Darrick,
I have modified the source as Jean suggested. Please apply.
---
>From 5b745774be8fe3f9670fe296b56a0c2964a362f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Crane Cai <crane.cai@....com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:13:58 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-scmi: support IBM SMBus CMI devices
*) add a new HID for IBM SMBus CMI devices
*) add methods for IBM SMBus CMI devices
*) hook different HID with different control methods set
Signed-off-by: Crane Cai <crane.cai@....com>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-scmi.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-scmi.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-scmi.c
index b4a55d4..d68b44f 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-scmi.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-scmi.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ struct acpi_smbus_cmi {
u8 cap_info:1;
u8 cap_read:1;
u8 cap_write:1;
+ struct smbus_methods_t *methods;
};
static const struct smbus_methods_t smbus_methods = {
@@ -41,8 +42,16 @@ static const struct smbus_methods_t smbus_methods = {
.mt_sbw = "_SBW",
};
+/* Some IBM BIOSes omit the leading underscore */
+static const struct smbus_methods_t ibm_smbus_methods = {
+ .mt_info = "SBI_",
+ .mt_sbr = "SBR_",
+ .mt_sbw = "SBW_",
+};
+
static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_smbus_cmi_ids[] = {
- {"SMBUS01", 0},
+ {"SMBUS01", (kernel_ulong_t)&smbus_methods},
+ {"SMBUSIBM", (kernel_ulong_t)&ibm_smbus_methods},
{"", 0}
};
@@ -150,11 +159,11 @@ acpi_smbus_cmi_access(struct i2c_adapter *adap, u16 addr, unsigned short flags,
if (read_write == I2C_SMBUS_READ) {
protocol |= ACPI_SMBUS_PRTCL_READ;
- method = smbus_methods.mt_sbr;
+ method = smbus_cmi->methods->mt_sbr;
input.count = 3;
} else {
protocol |= ACPI_SMBUS_PRTCL_WRITE;
- method = smbus_methods.mt_sbw;
+ method = smbus_cmi->methods->mt_sbw;
input.count = 5;
}
@@ -290,13 +299,13 @@ static int acpi_smbus_cmi_add_cap(struct acpi_smbus_cmi *smbus_cmi,
union acpi_object *obj;
acpi_status status;
- if (!strcmp(name, smbus_methods.mt_info)) {
+ if (!strcmp(name, smbus_cmi->methods->mt_info)) {
status = acpi_evaluate_object(smbus_cmi->handle,
- smbus_methods.mt_info,
+ smbus_cmi->methods->mt_info,
NULL, &buffer);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO, "Evaluating %s: %i",
- smbus_methods.mt_info, status));
+ smbus_cmi->methods->mt_info, status));
return -EIO;
}
@@ -319,9 +328,9 @@ static int acpi_smbus_cmi_add_cap(struct acpi_smbus_cmi *smbus_cmi,
kfree(buffer.pointer);
smbus_cmi->cap_info = 1;
- } else if (!strcmp(name, smbus_methods.mt_sbr))
+ } else if (!strcmp(name, smbus_cmi->methods->mt_sbr))
smbus_cmi->cap_read = 1;
- else if (!strcmp(name, smbus_methods.mt_sbw))
+ else if (!strcmp(name, smbus_cmi->methods->mt_sbw))
smbus_cmi->cap_write = 1;
else
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Unsupported CMI method: %s\n",
@@ -349,6 +358,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_smbus_cmi_query_methods(acpi_handle handle, u32 level,
static int acpi_smbus_cmi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
{
struct acpi_smbus_cmi *smbus_cmi;
+ const struct acpi_device_id *id;
smbus_cmi = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_smbus_cmi), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!smbus_cmi)
@@ -362,6 +372,11 @@ static int acpi_smbus_cmi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
smbus_cmi->cap_read = 0;
smbus_cmi->cap_write = 0;
+ for (id = acpi_smbus_cmi_ids; id->id[0]; id++)
+ if (!strcmp(id->id, acpi_device_hid(device)))
+ smbus_cmi->methods =
+ (struct smbus_methods_t *) id->driver_data;
+
acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_METHOD, smbus_cmi->handle, 1,
acpi_smbus_cmi_query_methods, smbus_cmi, NULL);
--
1.6.0.4
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 10:39:32AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > + for (id = (struct acpi_device_id *)acpi_smbus_cmi_ids; id->id[0]; id++)
>
> This cast shouldn't be needed. The problem is that you should have
> declared "id" const in the first place.
>
> > + if (!strcmp((char *) id->id, acpi_device_hid(device)))
>
> This cast doesn't seem needed either. At least I don't get any warning
> without it, do you?
>
--
Best Regards,
- Crane
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists