[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091025215225.05ac9ac9@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:52:25 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Disable affine wakeups by default
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:38:27 +0100
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 02:53 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 23:04 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > if (want_affine && (tmp->flags & SD_WAKE_AFFINE)
> > > &&
> > > - cpumask_test_cpu(prev_cpu,
> > > sched_domain_span(tmp))) {
> > > + (level == SD_LV_SIBLING || level
> > > == SD_LV_MC)) {
> >
> > quick comment without actually having looked at the patch, we should
> > really get rid of sd->level and encode properties of the sched
> > domains in sd->flags.
>
> Yeah, sounds right, while writing that, it looked kinda ugly. I
> suppose arch land needs to encode cache property somehow if I really
> want to be able to target cache on multicore. Booting becomes..
> exciting when I tinker down there.
or we just use SD_WAKE_AFFINE / SD_BALANCE_WAKE for this...
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists