lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:20:26 -0400
From:	"John W. Linville" <>
To:	Joe Perches <>
Cc:	Greg KH <>, Pavel Machek <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] strip: move driver to staging

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:07:43PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 11:48 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 06:24:34PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Anyway, for moving to staging, TODO file describing what needs to be
> > > fixed before it is brought back was listed as a requirement.
> > 	- A maintainer is needed to take ownership of this driver and
> > 	  they must be willing to maintain and test any future api
> > 	  changes needed.
> There are a lot of files in the tree without assigned maintainers.
> (want a list? ;)
> I think adding a requirement that files have maintainers before
> being added to not-staging is not a good thing.

This is not a blanket policy.  Please don't imply that it is.

> It is likely that strip could have be deleted without anyone caring.

Perhaps would that be better?  It would be less work for Greg,
but he seems to be fine with this...

John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you			might be all we have.  Be ready.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists