[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091027101534.GA27584@skywalker.linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:45:34 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 14354] Re: ext4 increased intolerance to unclean shutdown?
Can you try this patch ?
commit a8836b1d6f92273e001012c7705ae8f4c3d5fb65
Author: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue Oct 27 15:36:38 2009 +0530
ext4: discard preallocation during truncate
We need to make sure when we drop and reacquire the inode's
i_data_sem we discard the inode preallocation. Otherwise we
could have blocks marked as free in bitmap but still belonging
to prealloc space.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 5c5bc5d..a1ef1c3 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -209,6 +209,12 @@ static int try_to_extend_transaction(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
ret = ext4_journal_restart(handle, blocks_for_truncate(inode));
down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
+ /*
+ * We have dropped i_data_sem. So somebody else could have done
+ * block allocation. So discard the prealloc space created as a
+ * part of block allocation
+ */
+ ext4_discard_preallocations(inode);
return ret;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists