lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:55:58 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log [David Rientjes - Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 01:25:51PM -0700] | On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Mike Travis wrote: | ... | + | +void __init acpi_numa_print_srat_mapping(void) | +{ | + int i, j; | + | + for (i = 0; i < MAX_PXM_DOMAINS; i++) { | + int nid; | + | + nid = pxm_to_node(i); | + if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) Btw, David, while you at it, I just curious -- shouldn't we test it with NID_INVAL (as pxm_to_node_map initially defined to)? Not a big deal at all (since they are both = -1) but for the record. Or perhaps I miss something? | + continue; ... -- Cyrill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists