[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091027205558.GM5893@lenovo>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:55:58 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log
[David Rientjes - Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 01:25:51PM -0700]
| On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Mike Travis wrote:
|
...
| +
| +void __init acpi_numa_print_srat_mapping(void)
| +{
| + int i, j;
| +
| + for (i = 0; i < MAX_PXM_DOMAINS; i++) {
| + int nid;
| +
| + nid = pxm_to_node(i);
| + if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
Btw, David, while you at it, I just curious -- shouldn't we test it
with NID_INVAL (as pxm_to_node_map initially defined to)? Not a big
deal at all (since they are both = -1) but for the record.
Or perhaps I miss something?
| + continue;
...
-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists