lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:56:50 -0400
From:	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To:	David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>
Cc:	Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Dubois <jcd@...budubois.net>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>,
	Stable Kernel <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ima: remove ACPI dependency

On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 16:42 -0400, David Safford wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 12:36 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 11:59 -0400, David Safford wrote:
> > > Basically, if running on a system with a TPM, IMA wants the TPM
> > > boot measurement log, which the TPM driver can only get through
> > > ACPI. If the platform does not have a TPM, then IMA does not 
> > > need ACPI.
> > 
> > I'm afraid I'm not seeing the connection.  Where does IMA gets the boot
> > measurement log?  I see that the TPM exports that log in securityfs as 2
> > files (ascii and binary) in tpm_bios.c but I don't see how IMA ever
> > makes use of that log either internally to the kernel or through the
> > securityfs files.
> > 
> sorry - bad explanation. IMA reads PCR 0-7, and combines them into
> a single "boot_aggregate" as the first entry in the IMA list. For full
> attestation, a user level program needs access to both IMA's
> boot aggregate, and to the detailed TPM event log upon which
> the aggregate is based. So IMA does not itself access the logs,
> but the boot aggregate is less useful without them.

So users of IMA in userspace may want TPM.  Shouldn't the kernel really
have this as a depends/select in the TPM code?  This isn't IMA specific,
it's TPM specific.  Obviously I'm not a fan of the spurious ACPI
requirement in the IMA code.  How about a 'CONFIG_TPM_BIOS_LOG' or
something which selects ACPI?  We'll see what Rajiv thinks.

> As a separate issue, IMA requires the TPM driver to be compiled in
> (not loaded as a module) so it is available at IMA initialization, and
> the driver apparently requires ACPI in this case. I believe Rajiv
> will comment more on this.

I know it's required to be built in.  Didn't know that required ACPI,
but if so, that's a good reason to push this to the TPM code and get it
out of the IMA code....

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists