linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: TCP thin linear timeouts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <4AE83FE4.1050309@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
Date:	Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:58:12 +0100
From:	Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@...s.rwth-aachen.de>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Andreas Petlund <apetlund@...ula.no>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: TCP thin linear timeouts

Eric Dumazet schrieb:
> Andreas Petlund a écrit :
>> This patch will make TCP use only linear timeouts if the stream is thin. This will help to avoid the very high latencies that thin stream suffer because of exponential backoff. This mechanism is only active if enabled by iocontrol or syscontrol and the stream is identified as thin.
>>
> 
> Wont this reduce the session timeout to something very small, ie 15 retransmits, way under the minute ?

The session timeout no longer depends on the actual number of retransmits. Instead its a time interval,
which is roughly equivalent to the time a TCP, performing exponential backoff would need to perform
15 retransmits.

However, addressing the proposal:
I wonder how one can seriously suggest to just skip congestion response during timeout-based
loss recovery? I believe that in a heavily congested scenarios, this would lead to a goodput
goodput disaster... Not to mention that in a heavily congested scenario, suddenly every flow
will become "thin", so this will even amplify the problems. Or did I miss something?

Best regards,
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/