[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AE7B887.6090806@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:20:39 -0400
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
To: Andreas Petlund <apetlund@...ula.no>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shemminger@...tta.com, ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: TCP thin linear timeouts
Sorry to be too picky about the naming, but "rm_expb" really doesn't
mean what is actually done. Perhaps TCP_THIN_LINEAR_BACKOFF and
sysctl_tcp_thin_linear_backoff?
Also, as debated on some other recent patches, shouldn't the global
sysctl specify the default, and the per socket option specify the
forced override?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists