[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0910291517160.30265@V090114053VZO-1>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:18:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14467] Linker errors on ia64 with NR_CPUS=4096
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
> That would be nice but currently, we have no user which needs anything
> other than GFP_KERNEL although lack of users could have been caused by
> the lack of the functionality and the non-atomic irq disabled state is
> an exception case which is handled differently by might_sleep() too.
> So, I'm not sure whether adding GFP_* parameter would worth the
> effort. Also, adding that is a bit too late for 2.6.32 at this point.
As I have said repeately before: We need this for dynamic DMA slab
creation in SLUB. Since you got it already halfway in: Complete it and I
can get rid of the static percpu definitions that I had to add to be able
to use the new percpu allocator.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists