[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091029075735.GC18976@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:57:35 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix to use unused attribute
* Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> ____ftrace_check_##name() is used for compile-time check
> on F_printk() only, so it should be marked as __unused
> instead of __used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
>
> I'm thinking about introducing __always_unused, comparing
> to __maybe_unused.
>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_export.c | 5 +++--
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_export.c b/kernel/trace/trace_export.c
> index 934d81f..85309fc 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_export.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_export.c
> @@ -48,11 +48,12 @@
> struct ____ftrace_##name { \
> tstruct \
> }; \
> -static void __used ____ftrace_check_##name(void) \
> +static void __attribute__((unused)) \
> +____ftrace_check_##name(void) \
> { \
> struct ____ftrace_##name *__entry = NULL; \
> \
> - /* force cmpile-time check on F_printk() */ \
> + /* force compile-time check on F_printk() */ \
> printk(print); \
> }
Hm, open-coding __attribute__()'s is not good.
These tags are somewhat of a mess:
#if __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 3
# define __used __attribute__((__used__))
#else
# define __used __attribute__((__unused__))
#endif
I've Cc:-ed Linus and Andrew, to solicite feedback on __always_unused. I
think we should add it.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists