[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091029080410.GA26970@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:04:10 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC] tracefs
* Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 07:32:37AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > At LinuxCon this year, Steven and I talked about moving the
> > > debugfs usage in the tracing core to a stand-alone filesystem to
> > > give the ability to start to lock down the api so that people an
> > > count on what is going on in the tracing userspace interface.
> >
> > What we want to move out initially (and i talked to Steve and
> > Frederic about that a few weeks ago) is the event description bits -
> > the format stuff in /debug/tracing/events/ - but definitely not all
> > the other, rather messy and ad-hoc APIs.
> >
> > _No way_ do we want to tie down the pretty-printing ftrace details
> > as an ABI. We promised that when ftrace went upstream and all the
> > details are way too messy to be exposed in an ABI alike matter (and
> > yes, consider this a NAK Steve ;-).
>
> Ok, I'll drop this. There was some cleanups I found, I'll pick those
> out and send them on. What tree should I base off of to send cleanup
> patches to?
The tip of the tracing tree is in tip:tracing/core, you can find it at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git tracing/core
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists