[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AEC2971.8050105@imap.cc>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:11:29 +0100
From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
CC: André Goddard Rosa <andre.goddard@...il.com>,
trivial@...nel.org, linux list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] trivial: fix assorted "through" typos
Am 31.10.2009 11:17 schrieb Nigel Cunningham:
> I've only looked at this one, but something caught my eye...
>
> André Goddard Rosa wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/blackfin/kernel/cplb-mpu/cplbinit.c
>> b/arch/blackfin/kernel/cplb-mpu/cplbinit.c
>> index f7b9cdc..b52c1f8 100644
>> --- a/arch/blackfin/kernel/cplb-mpu/cplbinit.c
>> +++ b/arch/blackfin/kernel/cplb-mpu/cplbinit.c
>> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ void __init generate_cplb_tables_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_BFIN_EXTMEM_DCACHEABLE
>> d_cache = CPLB_L1_CHBL;
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_BFIN_EXTMEM_WRITETROUGH
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BFIN_EXTMEM_WRITETHROUGH
>> d_cache |= CPLB_L1_AOW | CPLB_WT;
>> #endif
>> #endif
>
> "Surely that can't be the only time?", I thought. But it is - all of the
> other #ifdefs are spelled correctly, so you're probably fixing a
> hard-to-find bug here! Good catch!
>
> Makes me wonder if anyone's written a tool to find things like this -
> #ifdefs that will never be defined...
I seem to remember someone (Joe Perches?) did, and regularly posted
results to LKML in the past, but at some point switched to publishing
them on a web page instead.
--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@...p.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (255 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists