[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091102122010.GA5552@gibson.comsick.at>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:20:11 +0100
From: Michael Guntsche <mike@...loops.com>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Page alloc problems with 2.6.32-rc kernels
Missed the CC's
Good morning,
> I have the server running with all with patches applied and it runs
> without any issues. Since adding patch5 seems to make a difference I
> will revert 1-4 and only apply patch 5 to see if it work too. I will
> report back as soon as I have news.
Current status of my tests here. With only patch 5 applied (the revert)
I am not able to reproduce the problem. Reading through the ml archives
I noticed that this revert is somewhat controversial since it seems to
fix other bugs. Is it possible that reverting those fixes just hide the bug I am seeing instead of fixing it?
Kind regards,
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists