[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200911040114.08879.elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 01:14:07 +0100
From: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To: Michael Guntsche <mike@...loops.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Page alloc problems with 2.6.32-rc kernels
Adding a few more CCs.
On Monday 02 November 2009, Michael Guntsche wrote:
> > I have the server running with all with patches applied and it runs
> > without any issues. Since adding patch5 seems to make a difference I
> > will revert 1-4 and only apply patch 5 to see if it work too. I will
> > report back as soon as I have news.
>
> Current status of my tests here. With only patch 5 applied (the revert)
> I am not able to reproduce the problem. Reading through the ml archives
> I noticed that this revert is somewhat controversial since it seems to
> fix other bugs. Is it possible that reverting those fixes just hide the
> bug I am seeing instead of fixing it?
Thanks Michael. That means we now have two cases where reverting the
congestion_wait() changes from .31-rc3 (8aa7e847d8 + 373c0a7ed3) makes a
clear and significant difference.
I wonder if more effort could/should be made on this aspect.
Cheers,
FJP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists