[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <swf7hu7i1tc.wl%takata@linux-m32r.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:14:07 +0900
From: Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>
To: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
linux-m32r@...linux-m32r.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m32r: Should index be positive?
At Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:33:06 +0100,
Roel Kluin wrote:
>
> Index `ipi_num' is signed, test whether it is negative to
> make sure we don't get a negative array element.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/m32r/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> Found by code analysis, is it required?
>
> diff --git a/arch/m32r/kernel/smp.c b/arch/m32r/kernel/smp.c
> index 8a88f1f..31cef20 100644
> --- a/arch/m32r/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/m32r/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ unsigned long send_IPI_mask_phys(cpumask_t physid_mask, int ipi_num,
>
> if (mask & ~physids_coerce(phys_cpu_present_map))
> BUG();
> - if (ipi_num >= NR_IPIS)
> + if (ipi_num >= NR_IPIS || ipi_num < 0)
> BUG();
>
> mask <<= IPI_SHIFT;
>
Acked-by: Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>
It looks OK for me.
I've merged this patch into my tree.
Thank you.
-- Takata
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists