linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] vsprintf: reduce code size by avoiding extra check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091102194037.GA19306@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:40:37 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	André Goddard Rosa <andre.goddard@...il.com>,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, harvey.harrison@...il.com,
	linux list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] vsprintf: reduce code size by avoiding extra
	check


* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure this change is necessary, the only impact is a small 
> reduce of binary code. Well, why not.

Small reductions in size are nice too. They counter-act small increases 
in kernel size. (which are way more common unfortunately)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/