[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091103064347.GA8082@liondog.tnic>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 07:43:47 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
bluesmoke-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/14] cpumask: use modern cpumask style in
drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 02:56:35PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> cpumask_t -> struct cpumask, and don't put one on the stack. (Note: this
> is actually on the stack unless CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y).
>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
I've got a similar patch already queued up but it
depends on the changes to rdmsr_on_cpus/wrmsr_on_cpus in
b8a4754147d61f5359a765a3afd3eb03012aa052 which is in tip/x86/cpu and
which does a bit more than your patch 4 so IMHO you could drop yours.
Concerning the edac change, yours is better and I could pick it up and
add it to my patch queue if nobody else has a problem with that?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists