lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:33:07 +1030 From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> To: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>, Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>, bluesmoke-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/14] cpumask: use modern cpumask style in drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:13:47 pm Borislav Petkov wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 02:56:35PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > cpumask_t -> struct cpumask, and don't put one on the stack. (Note: this > > is actually on the stack unless CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y). > > > > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> > > I've got a similar patch already queued up but it > depends on the changes to rdmsr_on_cpus/wrmsr_on_cpus in > b8a4754147d61f5359a765a3afd3eb03012aa052 which is in tip/x86/cpu and > which does a bit more than your patch 4 so IMHO you could drop yours. > > Concerning the edac change, yours is better and I could pick it up and > add it to my patch queue if nobody else has a problem with that? Less work for me sounds *excellent*. Thanks! Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists