[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091104163820.GK16736@boogie.lpds.sztaki.hu>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:38:20 +0100
From: Gabor Gombas <gombasg@...aki.hu>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jan Safranek <jsafrane@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...ibm.com>,
libcg-devel <libcg-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"menage@...gle.com" <menage@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Mount point suggestions for cgroup
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 09:35:30PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Yep, but hasn't the pollution already occured with /dev/cpuset today?
> sysfs would require work for changes to /sys, so do we go with Kame's
> suggestion of /cgroup?
debugfs is already under /sys.
If /dev is not popular, then how about dedicating a location (say
/kernel) as a base for mounting virtual file systems? So cgroups can get
/kernel/cgroup. hugetlbfs is often mounted on /dev/hugepages but that
does not seem to be standardized as well, so it could be the second
citizen under /kernel. configfs could be moved there too. Having a
different rule for every new virtual fs does not seem to be a good
idea...
Gabor
--
---------------------------------------------------------
MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
---------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists