[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830911040919k644a67cds713be3a0ea74e5d1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 09:19:18 -0800
From: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
libcg-devel <libcg-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Jan Safranek <jsafrane@...hat.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Mount point suggestions for cgroup
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:40 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Then, to say my own not-seriously-considered idea, I vote for
> - /cgroup/[HierarchyName]/
> rather than /dev/ or /sys or /opt. This sounds straightforward.
We're using /dev/cgroup (for single mounts) or
/dev/cgroup/$hierarchy_name (for multiple-mount configurations) but
that's mostly just due to the historical accident of /dev/cpuset. So
/cgroup/$hierarchy_name sounds plausible, or /kernel/cgroup/... as
suggested in another email.
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists