[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1257432262.3067.42.camel@falcon.domain.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:44:22 +0800
From: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@...il.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
huhb@...ote.com, yanh@...ote.com, Zhang Le <r0bertz@...too.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>, zhangfx@...ote.com,
liujl@...ote.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -queue v0 4/6] [loongson] add basic fuloong2f support
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 14:16 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > +
> > + if ((LOONGSON_INTISR & LOONGSON_INTEN) & LOONGSON_INT_BIT_INT0) {
> > + imr = inb(0x21) | (inb(0xa1) << 8);
> > + isr = inb(0x20) | (inb(0xa0) << 8);
> > + isr &= ~0x4; /* irq2 for cascade */
> > + isr &= ~imr;
> > + irq = ffs(isr) - 1;
> > + }
>
> Any reason why you're not using i8259_irq() from <asm/i8259.h> here?
> That function not only gets the locking right, it also minimizes the number
> of accesses to the i8259 - which even on modern silicon can be stuningly
> slow.
>
Seems there are some differences between here and the i8259_irq(), I
forget the details, perhaps "Yan Hua" can give a detail explaination.
> > +#if 1
> > + pci_read_config_byte(pdev, PCI_LATENCY_TIMER, &val);
> > + printk(KERN_INFO "cs5536 acc latency 0x%x\n", val);
> > + pci_write_config_byte(pdev, PCI_LATENCY_TIMER, 0xc0);
> > +#endif
>
> Seems like left over debug code?
>
> > + return;
> > +}
>
> And a useless return statement at the end of a void function.
>
Okay, will remove them later.
Regards,
Wu Zhangjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists