lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AF33C9E.6090609@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:59:10 +0100
From:	Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@...il.com>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
CC:	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/41] rewritten rt2800 drivers

On 11/04/09 21:19, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> <bzolnier@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is the rt2800 rewrite in the form of patches (I've trimmed cc:
>> list considerably since I'm not sure whether most people really want
>> to see 40+ patches in their mailboxes).
>>
>>
>> There were some minor changes since yesterday:
>>
>> - two new patches were added at the top of tree fixing Kconfig help
>>  entries of rt2800[pci,usb] drivers to be more helpful and to prevent
>>  wasting people's time (I think that patch #1 should go to Linus'
>>  tree as soon as possible, ditto for patch #2 and net-next tree)
>>
>> - patch descriptions were improved for many patches
>>  (suggestion from Ingo)
>>
>> - rt2x00_intf_is_[pci,usb]() helpers for commonly used checks were
>>  added to "rt2x00: add support for different chipset interfaces" patch
>>  (suggestion from Ivo)
>>
>> - addition of separate rt2800 MAINTAINERS entry was dropped for now
>>  because it stirred needless controversies distracting people from
>>  technical issues (thanks to Julian Calaby for pointing this to me),
>>  the goal of change was to make sure that people won't bother busy
>>  rt2x00 maintainers about rt2800 tree so it is not a big deal anyway
>>
>>
>> The rt2800 tree has also been updated to reflect those changes
>> (old branch is still available as rt2800-v1 for reference):
>>
>> The following changes since commit fa867e7355a1bdcd9bf7d55ebe9296f5b9c4028a:
>>  Juuso Oikarinen (1):
>>        wl1271: Generalize command response reading
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bart/misc.git rt2800
>>
>> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (41):
>>      rt2800usb: make Kconfig help entry more helpful
>>      rt2800pci: make Kconfig help entry more helpful
>>      rt2800usb: fix rt2800usb_rfcsr_read()
>>      rt2800pci: fix crypto in TX frame
>>      rt2800pci: fix comment about register access
>>      rt2800pci: fix comment about IV/EIV fields
>>      rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_register_read() comment
>>      rt2800usb: use rt2x00usb_register_multiwrite() to set key entries
>>      rt2800usb: add rt2800_register_[read,write]() wrappers
>>      rt2800pci: add rt2800_register_[read,write]() wrappers
>>      rt2800usb: add rt2800_register_multi[read,write]() wrappers
>>      rt2800pci: add rt2800_register_multi[read,write]() wrappers
>>      rt2800usb: add rt2800_regbusy_read() wrapper
>>      rt2800pci: add rt2800_regbusy_read() wrapper
>>      rt2800usb: add rt2800_bbp_[read,write]() wrappers
>>      rt2800pci: add rt2800_bbp_[read,write]() wrappers
>>      rt2800usb: add rt2800_rfcsr_[read,write]() wrappers
>>      rt2800pci: add rt2800_rfcsr_[read,write]() wrappers
>>      rt2800usb: add rt2800_rf_[read,write]() wrappers
>>      rt2800pci: add rt2800_rf_[read,write]() wrappers
>>      rt2800usb: add rt2800_mcu_request() wrapper
>>      rt2800pci: add rt2800_mcu_request() wrapper
>>      rt2x00: add driver private field to struct rt2x00_dev
>>      rt2800usb: convert to use struct rt2800_ops methods
>>      rt2800pci: convert to use struct rt2800_ops methods
>>      rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_register_multiwrite() arguments
>>      rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_regbusy_read() arguments
>>      rt2x00: fix rt2x00pci_register_multi[read,write]() arguments
>>      rt2800: add rt2800lib.h
>>      rt2800usb: fix comments in rt2800usb.h
>>      rt2800usb: add RXINFO_DESC_SIZE definition
>>      rt2800: fix duplication in header files
>>      rt2800: fix comments in rt2800.h
>>      rt2x00: add support for different chipset interfaces
>>      rt2800: prepare for rt2800lib addition
>>      rt2800: add rt2800lib (part one)
>>      rt2x00: remove needless ifdefs from rt2x00leds.h
>>      rt2800: add rt2800lib (part two)
>>      rt2x00: move REGISTER_BUSY_* definitions to rt2x00.h
>>      rt2800: add rt2800lib (part three)
>>      rt2800: add rt2800lib (part four)
>>
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/Kconfig      |   16 +-
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/Makefile     |    1 +
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h     | 1816 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c  | 1817 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h  |  134 +++
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c  | 1908 +++---------------------------
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.h  | 1780 ----------------------------
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c  | 1828 ++---------------------------
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.h  | 1818 +----------------------------
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00.h     |   43 +
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00leds.h |    4 -
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00pci.h  |   24 +-
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.c  |    2 +-
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.h  |   17 +-
>>  14 files changed, 4048 insertions(+), 7160 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h
>>
> 
> Hi Bart,
> 
> Many thanks for these patches.
> 
> So far I have been able to go through the first 30 patches of the
> series. I'll finish the other 11 tomorrow (when I'm back home and have
> better facilities to review these more elaborate patches of the
> series).
> They all look fine to me, I only had a comment for patch 10.
> 
> I've sent my ACKs for the remaining 29 I reviewed.
> 
> I guess Ivo still has to review them as well, as, so far, he has been
> the one of the rt2x00 project to give the final ACK for inclusion,
> unless he indicates that he is fine with my assessments.
> 
> ---
> Gertjan
> rt2x00 developer
> 

OK. I have now completed my review of the remaining patches and have sent my ACKs for those.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ