| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <43e72e890911051306q632ad8ar833346f5a4ea60fa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:06:52 -0800 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com> To: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@...il.com> Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/41] rewritten rt2800 drivers On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@...il.com> wrote: > On 11/04/09 21:19, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz >> <bzolnier@...il.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Here is the rt2800 rewrite in the form of patches (I've trimmed cc: >>> list considerably since I'm not sure whether most people really want >>> to see 40+ patches in their mailboxes). >>> >>> >>> There were some minor changes since yesterday: >>> >>> - two new patches were added at the top of tree fixing Kconfig help >>> entries of rt2800[pci,usb] drivers to be more helpful and to prevent >>> wasting people's time (I think that patch #1 should go to Linus' >>> tree as soon as possible, ditto for patch #2 and net-next tree) >>> >>> - patch descriptions were improved for many patches >>> (suggestion from Ingo) >>> >>> - rt2x00_intf_is_[pci,usb]() helpers for commonly used checks were >>> added to "rt2x00: add support for different chipset interfaces" patch >>> (suggestion from Ivo) >>> >>> - addition of separate rt2800 MAINTAINERS entry was dropped for now >>> because it stirred needless controversies distracting people from >>> technical issues (thanks to Julian Calaby for pointing this to me), >>> the goal of change was to make sure that people won't bother busy >>> rt2x00 maintainers about rt2800 tree so it is not a big deal anyway >>> >>> >>> The rt2800 tree has also been updated to reflect those changes >>> (old branch is still available as rt2800-v1 for reference): >>> >>> The following changes since commit fa867e7355a1bdcd9bf7d55ebe9296f5b9c4028a: >>> Juuso Oikarinen (1): >>> wl1271: Generalize command response reading >>> >>> are available in the git repository at: >>> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bart/misc.git rt2800 >>> >>> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (41): >>> rt2800usb: make Kconfig help entry more helpful >>> rt2800pci: make Kconfig help entry more helpful >>> rt2800usb: fix rt2800usb_rfcsr_read() >>> rt2800pci: fix crypto in TX frame >>> rt2800pci: fix comment about register access >>> rt2800pci: fix comment about IV/EIV fields >>> rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_register_read() comment >>> rt2800usb: use rt2x00usb_register_multiwrite() to set key entries >>> rt2800usb: add rt2800_register_[read,write]() wrappers >>> rt2800pci: add rt2800_register_[read,write]() wrappers >>> rt2800usb: add rt2800_register_multi[read,write]() wrappers >>> rt2800pci: add rt2800_register_multi[read,write]() wrappers >>> rt2800usb: add rt2800_regbusy_read() wrapper >>> rt2800pci: add rt2800_regbusy_read() wrapper >>> rt2800usb: add rt2800_bbp_[read,write]() wrappers >>> rt2800pci: add rt2800_bbp_[read,write]() wrappers >>> rt2800usb: add rt2800_rfcsr_[read,write]() wrappers >>> rt2800pci: add rt2800_rfcsr_[read,write]() wrappers >>> rt2800usb: add rt2800_rf_[read,write]() wrappers >>> rt2800pci: add rt2800_rf_[read,write]() wrappers >>> rt2800usb: add rt2800_mcu_request() wrapper >>> rt2800pci: add rt2800_mcu_request() wrapper >>> rt2x00: add driver private field to struct rt2x00_dev >>> rt2800usb: convert to use struct rt2800_ops methods >>> rt2800pci: convert to use struct rt2800_ops methods >>> rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_register_multiwrite() arguments >>> rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_regbusy_read() arguments >>> rt2x00: fix rt2x00pci_register_multi[read,write]() arguments >>> rt2800: add rt2800lib.h >>> rt2800usb: fix comments in rt2800usb.h >>> rt2800usb: add RXINFO_DESC_SIZE definition >>> rt2800: fix duplication in header files >>> rt2800: fix comments in rt2800.h >>> rt2x00: add support for different chipset interfaces >>> rt2800: prepare for rt2800lib addition >>> rt2800: add rt2800lib (part one) >>> rt2x00: remove needless ifdefs from rt2x00leds.h >>> rt2800: add rt2800lib (part two) >>> rt2x00: move REGISTER_BUSY_* definitions to rt2x00.h >>> rt2800: add rt2800lib (part three) >>> rt2800: add rt2800lib (part four) >>> >>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/Kconfig | 16 +- >>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/Makefile | 1 + >>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h | 1816 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 1817 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h | 134 +++ >>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c | 1908 +++--------------------------- >>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.h | 1780 ---------------------------- >>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c | 1828 ++--------------------------- >>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.h | 1818 +---------------------------- >>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00.h | 43 + >>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00leds.h | 4 - >>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00pci.h | 24 +- >>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.c | 2 +- >>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.h | 17 +- >>> 14 files changed, 4048 insertions(+), 7160 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h >>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c >>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h >>> >> >> Hi Bart, >> >> Many thanks for these patches. >> >> So far I have been able to go through the first 30 patches of the >> series. I'll finish the other 11 tomorrow (when I'm back home and have >> better facilities to review these more elaborate patches of the >> series). >> They all look fine to me, I only had a comment for patch 10. >> >> I've sent my ACKs for the remaining 29 I reviewed. >> >> I guess Ivo still has to review them as well, as, so far, he has been >> the one of the rt2x00 project to give the final ACK for inclusion, >> unless he indicates that he is fine with my assessments. >> >> --- >> Gertjan >> rt2x00 developer >> > > OK. I have now completed my review of the remaining patches and have sent my ACKs for those. A little summary would be nice for those who don't want to read single line acks/nacks. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists