| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:17:02 +0100 From: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@...il.com> To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com> CC: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/41] rewritten rt2800 drivers On 11/05/09 22:06, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Gertjan van Wingerde > <gwingerde@...il.com> wrote: >> On 11/04/09 21:19, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz >>> <bzolnier@...il.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Here is the rt2800 rewrite in the form of patches (I've trimmed cc: >>>> list considerably since I'm not sure whether most people really want >>>> to see 40+ patches in their mailboxes). >>>> >>>> >>>> There were some minor changes since yesterday: >>>> >>>> - two new patches were added at the top of tree fixing Kconfig help >>>> entries of rt2800[pci,usb] drivers to be more helpful and to prevent >>>> wasting people's time (I think that patch #1 should go to Linus' >>>> tree as soon as possible, ditto for patch #2 and net-next tree) >>>> >>>> - patch descriptions were improved for many patches >>>> (suggestion from Ingo) >>>> >>>> - rt2x00_intf_is_[pci,usb]() helpers for commonly used checks were >>>> added to "rt2x00: add support for different chipset interfaces" patch >>>> (suggestion from Ivo) >>>> >>>> - addition of separate rt2800 MAINTAINERS entry was dropped for now >>>> because it stirred needless controversies distracting people from >>>> technical issues (thanks to Julian Calaby for pointing this to me), >>>> the goal of change was to make sure that people won't bother busy >>>> rt2x00 maintainers about rt2800 tree so it is not a big deal anyway >>>> >>>> >>>> The rt2800 tree has also been updated to reflect those changes >>>> (old branch is still available as rt2800-v1 for reference): >>>> >>>> The following changes since commit fa867e7355a1bdcd9bf7d55ebe9296f5b9c4028a: >>>> Juuso Oikarinen (1): >>>> wl1271: Generalize command response reading >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bart/misc.git rt2800 >>>> >>>> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (41): >>>> rt2800usb: make Kconfig help entry more helpful >>>> rt2800pci: make Kconfig help entry more helpful >>>> rt2800usb: fix rt2800usb_rfcsr_read() >>>> rt2800pci: fix crypto in TX frame >>>> rt2800pci: fix comment about register access >>>> rt2800pci: fix comment about IV/EIV fields >>>> rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_register_read() comment >>>> rt2800usb: use rt2x00usb_register_multiwrite() to set key entries >>>> rt2800usb: add rt2800_register_[read,write]() wrappers >>>> rt2800pci: add rt2800_register_[read,write]() wrappers >>>> rt2800usb: add rt2800_register_multi[read,write]() wrappers >>>> rt2800pci: add rt2800_register_multi[read,write]() wrappers >>>> rt2800usb: add rt2800_regbusy_read() wrapper >>>> rt2800pci: add rt2800_regbusy_read() wrapper >>>> rt2800usb: add rt2800_bbp_[read,write]() wrappers >>>> rt2800pci: add rt2800_bbp_[read,write]() wrappers >>>> rt2800usb: add rt2800_rfcsr_[read,write]() wrappers >>>> rt2800pci: add rt2800_rfcsr_[read,write]() wrappers >>>> rt2800usb: add rt2800_rf_[read,write]() wrappers >>>> rt2800pci: add rt2800_rf_[read,write]() wrappers >>>> rt2800usb: add rt2800_mcu_request() wrapper >>>> rt2800pci: add rt2800_mcu_request() wrapper >>>> rt2x00: add driver private field to struct rt2x00_dev >>>> rt2800usb: convert to use struct rt2800_ops methods >>>> rt2800pci: convert to use struct rt2800_ops methods >>>> rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_register_multiwrite() arguments >>>> rt2x00: fix rt2x00usb_regbusy_read() arguments >>>> rt2x00: fix rt2x00pci_register_multi[read,write]() arguments >>>> rt2800: add rt2800lib.h >>>> rt2800usb: fix comments in rt2800usb.h >>>> rt2800usb: add RXINFO_DESC_SIZE definition >>>> rt2800: fix duplication in header files >>>> rt2800: fix comments in rt2800.h >>>> rt2x00: add support for different chipset interfaces >>>> rt2800: prepare for rt2800lib addition >>>> rt2800: add rt2800lib (part one) >>>> rt2x00: remove needless ifdefs from rt2x00leds.h >>>> rt2800: add rt2800lib (part two) >>>> rt2x00: move REGISTER_BUSY_* definitions to rt2x00.h >>>> rt2800: add rt2800lib (part three) >>>> rt2800: add rt2800lib (part four) >>>> >>>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/Kconfig | 16 +- >>>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/Makefile | 1 + >>>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h | 1816 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 1817 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h | 134 +++ >>>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c | 1908 +++--------------------------- >>>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.h | 1780 ---------------------------- >>>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.c | 1828 ++--------------------------- >>>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800usb.h | 1818 +---------------------------- >>>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00.h | 43 + >>>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00leds.h | 4 - >>>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00pci.h | 24 +- >>>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.c | 2 +- >>>> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.h | 17 +- >>>> 14 files changed, 4048 insertions(+), 7160 deletions(-) >>>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800.h >>>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c >>>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h >>>> >>> >>> Hi Bart, >>> >>> Many thanks for these patches. >>> >>> So far I have been able to go through the first 30 patches of the >>> series. I'll finish the other 11 tomorrow (when I'm back home and have >>> better facilities to review these more elaborate patches of the >>> series). >>> They all look fine to me, I only had a comment for patch 10. >>> >>> I've sent my ACKs for the remaining 29 I reviewed. >>> >>> I guess Ivo still has to review them as well, as, so far, he has been >>> the one of the rt2x00 project to give the final ACK for inclusion, >>> unless he indicates that he is fine with my assessments. >>> >>> --- >>> Gertjan >>> rt2x00 developer >>> >> >> OK. I have now completed my review of the remaining patches and have sent my ACKs for those. > > A little summary would be nice for those who don't want to read single > line acks/nacks. > I'm sorry. In my mind the message was clear that I Acked all of the remaining patches in the series. Apparently not :-( So, basically, from my side all patches have been acked, with the exception of path 10 of the series (which was only a minor issue). --- Gertjan. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists