linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] Added PR_SET_PROCTITLE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3e8340490911091600v3a0e9b67r279349ac852d604a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:00:17 -0500
From:	Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Americo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	Timo Sirainen <tss@....fi>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Added PR_SET_PROCTITLE_AREA option for prctl()

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> What happens if userspace unmaps the memory after telling the kernel to
> use it?
>
> Will processes which try to read the command line get an error reading
> /proc?  If so, do all the commandline-reading programs in the world
> handle this in an appropriate fashion?

This case can already occur in the current code; the userspace process
would have to munmap() the top of its stack, but it certainly can do
so if it tries. In any case, access_process_vm() then returns 0
because of the fault, and thus /proc/pid/cmdline is seen to have zero
length. Since a zero-length /proc/pid/cmdline occurs with kernel
threads as well, we know this isn't a problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/