[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f11576a0911100306k7e2a64b9r35e13454be858140@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:06:31 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Americo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Timo Sirainen <tss@....fi>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Added PR_SET_PROCTITLE_AREA option for prctl()
2009/11/10 Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com>:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>> What happens if userspace unmaps the memory after telling the kernel to
>> use it?
>>
>> Will processes which try to read the command line get an error reading
>> /proc? If so, do all the commandline-reading programs in the world
>> handle this in an appropriate fashion?
>
> This case can already occur in the current code; the userspace process
> would have to munmap() the top of its stack, but it certainly can do
> so if it tries. In any case, access_process_vm() then returns 0
> because of the fault, and thus /proc/pid/cmdline is seen to have zero
> length. Since a zero-length /proc/pid/cmdline occurs with kernel
> threads as well, we know this isn't a problem.
Plus, ps can read under exiting process. In this case, task->mm is NULL and
proc_pid_cmdline return 0.
procps tools are already NUL safe since long time ago.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists