[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091110185944.GA20935@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:59:44 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: x86@...nel.org, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86: add new cache descriptors
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 01:49:24PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
> index 804c40e..228fc67 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,9 @@ static const struct _cache_table __cpuinitconst cache_table[] =
> { 0xe2, LVL_3, 2048 }, /* 16-way set assoc, 64 byte line size */
> { 0xe3, LVL_3, 4096 }, /* 16-way set assoc, 64 byte line size */
> { 0xe4, LVL_3, 8192 }, /* 16-way set assoc, 64 byte line size */
> + { 0xea, LVL_3, 12288 }, /* 24-way set assoc, 64 byte line size */
> + { 0xeb, LVL_3, 18432 }, /* 24-way set assoc, 64 byte line size */
> + { 0xec, LVL_3, 24576 }, /* 24-way set assoc, 64 byte line size */
> { 0x00, 0, 0}
btw, something I'm thinking of doing as a followup is making these use the
defines like we have in drivers/char/agp/agp.h
#define KB(x) ((x) * 1024)
#define MB(x) (KB (KB (x)))
#define GB(x) (MB (KB (x)))
There's a few similar definitions throughout the tree. Any opinions on whether
I should add these to kernel.h, or create a new header for them ?
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists