[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091110205342.GA23196@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:53:42 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fix typo in intel cache size
* Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> I double-checked the datasheet. This should be 2MB.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
> index 804c40e..6123138 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static const struct _cache_table __cpuinitconst cache_table[] =
>  	{ 0xd1, LVL_3,    1024 },	/* 4-way set assoc, 64 byte line size */
>  	{ 0xd2, LVL_3,    2048 },	/* 4-way set assoc, 64 byte line size */
>  	{ 0xd6, LVL_3,    1024 },	/* 8-way set assoc, 64 byte line size */
> -	{ 0xd7, LVL_3,    2038 },	/* 8-way set assoc, 64 byte line size */
> +	{ 0xd7, LVL_3,    2048 },	/* 8-way set assoc, 64 byte line size */
ah, thanks - applied.
I also marked both fixes from you for -stable backport - these are 
pretty risk-free fixes and cpuinfo looks ugly on new CPUs without a 
proper cache size entry.
Thanks,
	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists