| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:19:12 GMT
From: "tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Fix note_new_gpnum() uses of ->gpnum
Commit-ID: 9160306e6f5b68bb64630c9031c517ca1cf463db
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/9160306e6f5b68bb64630c9031c517ca1cf463db
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:52:29 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:12:11 +0100
rcu: Fix note_new_gpnum() uses of ->gpnum
Impose a clear locking design on the note_new_gpnum()
function's use of the ->gpnum counter. This is done by updating
rdp->gpnum only from the corresponding leaf rcu_node structure's
rnp->gpnum field, and even then only under the protection of
that same rcu_node structure's ->lock field. Performance and
scalability are maintained using a form of double-checked
locking, and excessive spinning is avoided by use of the
spin_trylock() function. The use of spin_trylock() is safe due
to the fact that CPUs who fail to acquire this lock will try
again later. The hierarchical nature of the rcu_node data
structure limits contention (which could be limited further if
need be using the RCU_FANOUT kernel parameter).
Without this patch, obscure but quite possible races could
result in a quiescent state that occurred during one grace
period to be accounted to the following grace period, causing
this following grace period to end prematurely. Not good!
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: laijs@...fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@...ibm.com
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Cc: josh@...htriplett.org
Cc: dvhltc@...ibm.com
Cc: niv@...ibm.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com
Cc: <stable@...nel.org> # .32.x
LKML-Reference: <12571987492350-git-send-email->
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 9e068d1..ec007dd 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -540,13 +540,33 @@ static void check_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
/*
* Update CPU-local rcu_data state to record the newly noticed grace period.
* This is used both when we started the grace period and when we notice
- * that someone else started the grace period.
+ * that someone else started the grace period. The caller must hold the
+ * ->lock of the leaf rcu_node structure corresponding to the current CPU,
+ * and must have irqs disabled.
*/
+static void __note_new_gpnum(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
+{
+ if (rdp->gpnum != rnp->gpnum) {
+ rdp->qs_pending = 1;
+ rdp->passed_quiesc = 0;
+ rdp->gpnum = rnp->gpnum;
+ }
+}
+
static void note_new_gpnum(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
- rdp->qs_pending = 1;
- rdp->passed_quiesc = 0;
- rdp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ rnp = rdp->mynode;
+ if (rdp->gpnum == ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->gpnum) || /* outside lock. */
+ !spin_trylock(&rnp->lock)) { /* irqs already off, retry later. */
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ return;
+ }
+ __note_new_gpnum(rsp, rnp, rdp);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
}
/*
@@ -637,6 +657,9 @@ rcu_start_gp_per_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_dat
*/
rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL] = rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL];
rdp->nxttail[RCU_WAIT_TAIL] = rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL];
+
+ /* Set state so that this CPU will detect the next quiescent state. */
+ __note_new_gpnum(rsp, rnp, rdp);
}
/*
@@ -664,7 +687,6 @@ rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
rsp->jiffies_force_qs = jiffies + RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS;
record_gp_stall_check_time(rsp);
dyntick_record_completed(rsp, rsp->completed - 1);
- note_new_gpnum(rsp, rdp);
/* Special-case the common single-level case. */
if (NUM_RCU_NODES == 1) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists