lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:03:00 -0800 From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org> To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] rcu: remove inline from forward-referenced functions On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 01:37:19PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Some variants of gcc are reputed to dislike forward references to > functions declared "inline". Remove the "inline" keyword from such > functions. > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > kernel/rcutree.h | 2 +- > kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Seems very reasonable. For functions declared static and called once, GCC doesn't really need any help figuring out that it should inline them. Acked-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists