lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:41:01 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Remove inline from forward-referenced functions On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 03:06:20PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 14:59 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > non-inline functions in .h files probably aren't a good idea. > > ;-) > > Here are my options: > [] > > Please note that kernel/rcutree_plugin.h is internal to RCU -- only > > kernel/rcutree.c includes it, so there is no possibility of conflicting > > definitions. > > > > Any options that I am missing? > > Maybe something like: > > #ifdef whatever > #define RCU_ANNOUNCE "Hierarchical RCU implementation.\n" > ... > #else > #define RCU_ANNOUNCE "Experimental preemptable hierarchical RCU implementation.\n" > ... > #endif > > Use pr_info(RCU_ANNOUNCE) instead of rcu_bootup_announce(); > > ? This would still be a forward reference, right? Unless I am missing something, changing from a static inline to a cpp macro doesn't change anything. Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists