| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20091112100956.fc72080e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:09:56 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> To: linux-next@...r.kernel.org Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, lenb@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 12 (acpi_processor_get_bios_limit) On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:40:12 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:51:01 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20091111: > > > > The cpufreq tree gained a conflict against the acpi tree. > > when CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n: > > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.o: In function `acpi_processor_get_bios_limit': > (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `acpi_processor_get_bios_limit' > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here > > > The function definition in include/apci/procssor.h needs to be "static inline" > at line 323. --- however, even with that fixed, when CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y CONFIG_ACPI=n CONFIG_SFI=y CONFIG_APM=y there is this build error: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c:720: error: 'acpi_processor_get_bios_limit' undeclared here (not in a function) --- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists