| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091112181350.68c866e7@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:13:50 +0000 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: "Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" <hmh@....eng.br> Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>, "Robert Hancock" <hancockrwd@...il.com>, "Anton D. Kachalov" <mouse@...c.ru>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Reading /dev/mem by dd On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:57:49 -0200 "Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" <hmh@....eng.br> wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:49 +0000, "Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > > > In this case, the problem seems to be access over /dev/mem to stuff the > > > kernel is already taking care of. Certainly "as safe as possible" does > > > > Which is often what is desired - eg debugging driver stuff. > > > > > not have to mean making /dev/mem useless for whatever good uses it has. > > > > It does. Plain and simple. > > Is that the only valid use of /dev/mem, or even its main use? These days it is the primary use. Things like X11 were historically probably the biggest user of it, and things like LRMI sometimes need that sort of stuff. The X case also involves X and the kernel both working with the same resource and in many cases that resource having registers that can crash a system if mis-accessed. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists