[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94a0d4530911131228s6b6b6221o7b24002ca03373e5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:28:41 +0200
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] acpi: fix trivial warning
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 02:23 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 17:34 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> >> I did... the style issues are already there, my patch is not
>> >> introducing them. Do you want me to send a separate patch to fix the
>> >> existing style issues?
>> >
>> > Yes, If your inclined to clean up the whole file, or just the
>> > surrounding code that would be helpful ..
>>
>> Nobody seems to like the patch you suggested me to do... did I wasted
>> my time doing it?
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/42383
>
> Did you get some negative feedback ? I don't see any..
Well:
---
And after today's discussion on kernel summit on this topic, I wouldn't
expect any maintainer to merge it, sorry :)
---
That doesn't seem too positive. Or at least there's no indication that
somebody will pick it up.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists