linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] acpi: fix trivial warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:37:08 -0200
From:	Thiago Farina <tfransosi@...il.com>
To:	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
Cc:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] acpi: fix trivial warning

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 02:23 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com> wrote:
>>> > On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 17:34 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>> >> I did... the style issues are already there, my patch is not
>>> >> introducing them. Do you want me to send a separate patch to fix the
>>> >> existing style issues?
>>> >
>>> > Yes, If your inclined to clean up the whole file, or just the
>>> > surrounding code that would be helpful ..
>>>
>>> Nobody seems to like the patch you suggested me to do... did I wasted
>>> my time doing it?
>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/42383
>>
>> Did you get some negative feedback ? I don't see any..
>
> Well:
> ---
> And after today's discussion on kernel summit on this topic, I wouldn't
> expect any maintainer to merge it, sorry :)
> ---
>
> That doesn't seem too positive. Or at least there's no indication that
> somebody will pick it up.

I think it is because it doesn't "aggregate" real value to the kernel
(like fixing a crash, that adds value), and the other guys has more
things to do, and don't have time to waste. But that can not be the
true, this is just my point of view.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/