[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091113132728.0f1db7c5@s6510>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:27:28 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Patrick Mullaney <pmullaney@...ell.com>
Cc: kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
alacrityvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] macvlan: support for guest vm direct rx/tx
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:55:06 -0500
Patrick Mullaney <pmullaney@...ell.com> wrote:
> These patches allow other modules to override the receive
> path of a macvlan. This is being done to support guest
> VMs operating directly over a macvlan. Routines to allow
> creation and deletion of macvlans from in-kernel modules
> were also exposed/added.
Which guest VM, how will it use it? The kernel is not in the business
of providing infrastructure for out of tree patches.
Also, macvlan should really being calling netif_receive_skb()
not going through another queue/softirq cycle.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists