| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091115081736.GA29826@elte.hu> Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:17:36 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, lihong.hi@...il.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: + recordmcount-stfu.patch added to -mm tree * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote: > On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 10:27 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 21:26 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > Dunno, really. How many people are running old objdump, and do we > > > > want to retard the rate at which the stragglers will upgrade? > > > > > > I guess not, but by printing out a warning > > > 1000000000000000000000000000 times per build, it may encourage them to > > > upgrade ;-) > > > > If that binutils version is still supported this is not the right > > method. People are in their full rights to be at any version within the > > supported versions interval, and we should not 'force' them. > > It's not forcing them. [...] My point was that by printing a warning 1000000000000000000000000000 times per build we effectively force them, by making life unpleasant. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists