[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091115083951.GA27393@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:39:51 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Am??rico Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl.c: Change a .proc_handler = proc_dointvec to
&proc_dointvec,
* Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 09:11 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Am??rico Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 05:52:05PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > >Seems to be a typo.
> > > Acked-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> > (Cc:-ed Eric who is running the sysctl tree these days)
> > Almost everywhere in the kernel we use the shorter version, so all of
> > sysctl.c should eventually change to that variant.
>
> It's closer to 50/50, but it's 1 vs 133 in that file.
>
> $ grep -Pr --include=*.[ch] '\.proc_handler\s*=\s*&\s*\w+' * | wc -l
> 339
>
> $ grep -Pr --include=*.[ch] '\.proc_handler\s*=\s*[^&]\s*\w+' * | wc -l
> 432
I did not mean this specific initialization method of proc_handler, i
meant pointers to functions in general.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists