[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091116144402.GA16696@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:44:02 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bhavna.sarathy@....com,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, andreas.herrmann3@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: AMD Northbridge: Verify NB's node is online
* Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> >>
> >>Hardware maybe programmed incorrectly and return a bogus node
> >>ID. Check to see if the node is actually online before setting
> >>the numa node for an AMD northbridge in quirk_amd_nb_node().
> >
> >Hm, could you stick a printk in there, what precise node ID does
> >the hardware return?
> >
>
> Ingo, yup -- I put in a printk and commented out the set_dev_node()
> call when debugging this
> and got this output:
>
> quirk_amd_nb_node: current numa_node = 0x0, would set to val & 7 = 0x0
> quirk_amd_nb_node: current numa_node = 0x0, would set to val & 7 = 0x1
> quirk_amd_nb_node: current numa_node = 0x0, would set to val & 7 = 0x2
> quirk_amd_nb_node: current numa_node = 0x0, would set to val & 7 = 0x3
>
> The issue appears to be that the HW has set val to a valid value,
> however, the system is only configured for a single node -- 0.
>
> I realize that I'm working around broken HW ... but I think that a
> quirk, quirk_amd_nb_node(), should at least keep systems booting ...
Ok. I cleaned up the patch a bit and added a comment explaining the
logic - and also expanded the changelog with your new debug data, and
applied it to tip:x86/urgent. Please check the commit notification email
whether it's all OK.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists