lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:55:53 -0800 From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> Cc: joe@...ches.com, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl.c: Change a .proc_handler = proc_dointvec to Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> writes: >> - .proc_handler = proc_dointvec >> + .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec, > > NAK. > > commit 6d9f239a1edb31d6133230f478fd1dc2da338ec5 > Author: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> > Date: Mon Nov 3 18:21:05 2008 -0800 > > net: '&' redux > > I want to compile out proc_* and sysctl_* handlers totally and > stub them to NULL depending on config options, however usage of & > will prevent this, since taking adress of NULL pointer will break > compilation. I just experimented with this and found that at present a number of the proc handlers wrap functions like proc_dointvec, so it does not work. Did you have a plan for those? Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists