linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sysctl.c: Change a .proc_handler = proc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091117114922.GA1657@x200>
Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:49:22 +0300
From:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	joe@...ches.com, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl.c: Change a .proc_handler = proc_dointvec to

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:55:53AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> writes:

> >     net: '&' redux
> >     
> >     I want to compile out proc_* and sysctl_* handlers totally and
> >     stub them to NULL depending on config options, however usage of &
> >     will prevent this, since taking adress of NULL pointer will break
> >     compilation.
> 
> I just experimented with this and found that at present a number of
> the proc handlers wrap functions like proc_dointvec, so it does not work.
> 
> Did you have a plan for those?

Of course, net/ was just first big step.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/