[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B02CC46.4020506@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:16:06 -0800
From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: add FUTEX_SET_WAIT operation
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 09:18 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> Would you be interested in adding it as a 'perf bench futex' testcase?
>> That way kernel developers could monitor futex performance in the future
>> as well.
>>
>> See 'perf bench' in the latest perf events tree:
>>
>> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
>>
>> Do 'cd tools/perf; make -j install' to install perf.
>
> Darren has recently been putting a lot of effort in making a futex test
> suite:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/dvhart/futextest.git
>
> Its not yet complete, but hopefully it will soon be :-)
>
Michael, would you be willing to include a version of this test in the
above test suite? If so, then in keeping with the rest of the test
suite, I would recommend splitting into two tests, one of each opcode
being tested, and add argument to define thread count. The run.sh
script would then run each thread count as a separate test run.
--
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists